ODR arbitration participation remains mandatory after failed conciliation, while jurisdictional and maintainability objections stay available before t...
Transparency in technical bid evaluation requires disclosed standards and recorded reasons; opaque scoring invalidated tender awards and required fres...
Automated export obligation extensions remove separate regional applications after committee approval for Advance Authorisation and EPCG authorisation...
International cargo transhipment through Indian ports continues with Customs-controlled storage, re-export safeguards, and coordinated multi-station m...
Transfer pricing disputes resolved under the India-Japan MAP can be given effect only after the assessee withdraws the appeal ground covered by the resolution. Article 25 of the treaty was invoked for the transaction with Japanese associated enterprises, and the assessee stated that it would accept the competent authorities' resolution. Under Rule 44G, the Assessing Officer is to pass orders giving effect to the MAP resolution once the related appeal is withdrawn. The assessee accordingly requested withdrawal of the relevant ground, and the tax department raised no objection.
Transfer pricing disputes resolved under the India-Japan MAP can be given effect only after the assessee withdraws the appeal ground covered by the resolution. Article 25 of the treaty was invoked for the transaction with Japanese associated enterprises, and the assessee stated that it would accept the competent authorities' resolution. Under Rule 44G, the Assessing Officer is to pass orders giving effect to the MAP resolution once the related appeal is withdrawn. The assessee accordingly requested withdrawal of the relevant ground, and the tax department raised no objection.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4824 
Join Channel 
