Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Page of 4814
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1461 to 1480 of 96262 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Recovery of drawback under Rules 16 and 16A of the 1995 Drawback Rules was held impermissible after the 2017 Drawback Rules came into force, because the repeal and saving provision in rule 20(2) did not preserve such proceedings and the show cause notice was issued only after the new rules operated. Denial of All Industry Rate drawback was rejected where the export consignments were assessed, Let Export Orders were issued, and drawback was granted; alleged fake procurement invoices could not defeat the claim, and the recorded statement was inadmissible without compliance with section 138B. Confiscation of goods already exported was also set aside, and penalties under sections 114 and 114AA on the exporter and partner could not survive.
Recovery of drawback under Rules 16 and 16A of the 1995 Drawback Rules was held impermissible after the 2017 Drawback Rules came into force, because the repeal and saving provision in rule 20(2) did not preserve such proceedings and the show cause notice was issued only after the new rules operated. Denial of All Industry Rate drawback was rejected where the export consignments were assessed, Let Export Orders were issued, and drawback was granted; alleged fake procurement invoices could not defeat the claim, and the recorded statement was inadmissible without compliance with section 138B. Confiscation of goods already exported was also set aside, and penalties under sections 114 and 114AA on the exporter and partner could not survive.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.