Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
A pledge arrangement created only a security interest and did not, by itself, establish ownership or operational control over Danyang ILT; with shareholding already transferred, the Essilor Group was not shown to retain control and adverse inference could not be drawn for annual reports not shown to be within its possession. The Tribunal also held that, in a non-market economy investigation, only information relevant to normal value and export price was required, so non-exporting related producers' data was unnecessary where normal value was constructed from domestic industry costs and export information for the supply chain was disclosed. The Essilor Group was therefore wrongly treated as non-cooperative, and the anti-dumping recommendation was set aside for fresh consideration.
A pledge arrangement created only a security interest and did not, by itself, establish ownership or operational control over Danyang ILT; with shareholding already transferred, the Essilor Group was not shown to retain control and adverse inference could not be drawn for annual reports not shown to be within its possession. The Tribunal also held that, in a non-market economy investigation, only information relevant to normal value and export price was required, so non-exporting related producers' data was unnecessary where normal value was constructed from domestic industry costs and export information for the supply chain was disclosed. The Essilor Group was therefore wrongly treated as non-cooperative, and the anti-dumping recommendation was set aside for fresh consideration.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4816 
Join Channel 
