Transaction value and connected person treatment in excise valuation: proprietary concerns not inter connected undertakings, relief on valuation and c...
Appointment of Registrars as adjudicating officers under Companies Act reallocates territorial jurisdiction and sets appeal route to Regional Director...
Composite supply of drilling services and site specific chemicals characterised as composite supply; prior advance rulings set aside, tax rate left op...
Cross country pipeline classification and ITC entitlement: pipelines outside factory treated as immovable, ITC disallowed under Section 17 restriction...
A pledge arrangement created only a security interest and did not, by itself, establish ownership or operational control over Danyang ILT; with shareholding already transferred, the Essilor Group was not shown to retain control and adverse inference could not be drawn for annual reports not shown to be within its possession. The Tribunal also held that, in a non-market economy investigation, only information relevant to normal value and export price was required, so non-exporting related producers' data was unnecessary where normal value was constructed from domestic industry costs and export information for the supply chain was disclosed. The Essilor Group was therefore wrongly treated as non-cooperative, and the anti-dumping recommendation was set aside for fresh consideration.
A pledge arrangement created only a security interest and did not, by itself, establish ownership or operational control over Danyang ILT; with shareholding already transferred, the Essilor Group was not shown to retain control and adverse inference could not be drawn for annual reports not shown to be within its possession. The Tribunal also held that, in a non-market economy investigation, only information relevant to normal value and export price was required, so non-exporting related producers' data was unnecessary where normal value was constructed from domestic industry costs and export information for the supply chain was disclosed. The Essilor Group was therefore wrongly treated as non-cooperative, and the anti-dumping recommendation was set aside for fresh consideration.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
