Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
A pledge arrangement created only a security interest and did not, by itself, establish ownership or operational control over Danyang ILT; with shareholding already transferred, the Essilor Group was not shown to retain control and adverse inference could not be drawn for annual reports not shown to be within its possession. The Tribunal also held that, in a non-market economy investigation, only information relevant to normal value and export price was required, so non-exporting related producers' data was unnecessary where normal value was constructed from domestic industry costs and export information for the supply chain was disclosed. The Essilor Group was therefore wrongly treated as non-cooperative, and the anti-dumping recommendation was set aside for fresh consideration.
A pledge arrangement created only a security interest and did not, by itself, establish ownership or operational control over Danyang ILT; with shareholding already transferred, the Essilor Group was not shown to retain control and adverse inference could not be drawn for annual reports not shown to be within its possession. The Tribunal also held that, in a non-market economy investigation, only information relevant to normal value and export price was required, so non-exporting related producers' data was unnecessary where normal value was constructed from domestic industry costs and export information for the supply chain was disclosed. The Essilor Group was therefore wrongly treated as non-cooperative, and the anti-dumping recommendation was set aside for fresh consideration.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4823 
Join Channel 
