Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
Page of 4814
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
901 to 920 of 96262 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NCLAT upheld rejection of a society's belated claim in CIRP, holding that it had prior knowledge of the insolvency process, was called upon to file its claim, and had itself recorded that its dispute with the developer was fully and finally settled. In light of the approved resolution plan and the principles in RPS Infrastructure and Essar Steel, the Tribunal held that a delayed claim could not be entertained to reopen the CIRP after CoC approval. The later plea of breach of settlement was treated as an afterthought. As no independent infirmity remained in the resolution plan approval, the Tribunal declined appellate interference and left the plan undisturbed.
NCLAT upheld rejection of a society's belated claim in CIRP, holding that it had prior knowledge of the insolvency process, was called upon to file its claim, and had itself recorded that its dispute with the developer was fully and finally settled. In light of the approved resolution plan and the principles in RPS Infrastructure and Essar Steel, the Tribunal held that a delayed claim could not be entertained to reopen the CIRP after CoC approval. The later plea of breach of settlement was treated as an afterthought. As no independent infirmity remained in the resolution plan approval, the Tribunal declined appellate interference and left the plan undisturbed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.