Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
NCLAT upheld rejection of a society's belated claim in CIRP, holding that it had prior knowledge of the insolvency process, was called upon to file its claim, and had itself recorded that its dispute with the developer was fully and finally settled. In light of the approved resolution plan and the principles in RPS Infrastructure and Essar Steel, the Tribunal held that a delayed claim could not be entertained to reopen the CIRP after CoC approval. The later plea of breach of settlement was treated as an afterthought. As no independent infirmity remained in the resolution plan approval, the Tribunal declined appellate interference and left the plan undisturbed.
NCLAT upheld rejection of a society's belated claim in CIRP, holding that it had prior knowledge of the insolvency process, was called upon to file its claim, and had itself recorded that its dispute with the developer was fully and finally settled. In light of the approved resolution plan and the principles in RPS Infrastructure and Essar Steel, the Tribunal held that a delayed claim could not be entertained to reopen the CIRP after CoC approval. The later plea of breach of settlement was treated as an afterthought. As no independent infirmity remained in the resolution plan approval, the Tribunal declined appellate interference and left the plan undisturbed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.