Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Page of 4824
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
601 to 620 of 96463 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
CIRP-generated surplus cash flow was held not to vest in the successful resolution applicant because the approved resolution plan contained no express provision dealing with that surplus. The Tribunal read clauses 3.9.5, 3.9.8 and 4.1(ii) as covering margin money, fixed deposits and temporary utilisation for foreclosure, but not creating any proprietary right over surplus generated while the corporate debtor remained under the Resolution Professional's control. In the absence of contractual allocation in the plan, the surplus retained its character as part of the insolvency estate and was directed to be distributed under Section 53. That direction was treated as addressing a matter not contemplated by the plan, not as modifying the approved resolution plan.
CIRP-generated surplus cash flow was held not to vest in the successful resolution applicant because the approved resolution plan contained no express provision dealing with that surplus. The Tribunal read clauses 3.9.5, 3.9.8 and 4.1(ii) as covering margin money, fixed deposits and temporary utilisation for foreclosure, but not creating any proprietary right over surplus generated while the corporate debtor remained under the Resolution Professional's control. In the absence of contractual allocation in the plan, the surplus retained its character as part of the insolvency estate and was directed to be distributed under Section 53. That direction was treated as addressing a matter not contemplated by the plan, not as modifying the approved resolution plan.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4824 
Join Channel 
