Educational approval requires mandatory State registration, but incidental surplus and trustee-owned land do not prove private benefit or profit motiv...
Judicial review of settlement orders cannot reopen settled customs notices, while statutory interest remains subject to verification and quantificatio...
Customs Broker licence lending for consideration justified revocation where exporter authorisation and client verification obligations were also breac...
Fraudulent import documents suspend limitation protection, while redemption of confiscated goods requires duty and interest despite bona fide purchase...
ODR arbitration participation remains mandatory after failed conciliation, while jurisdictional and maintainability objections stay available before t...
Transparency in technical bid evaluation requires disclosed standards and recorded reasons; opaque scoring invalidated tender awards and required fres...
Automated export obligation extensions remove separate regional applications after committee approval for Advance Authorisation and EPCG authorisation...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
441 to 460 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
CIRP-generated surplus cash flow was held not to vest in the successful resolution applicant because the approved resolution plan contained no express provision dealing with that surplus. The Tribunal read clauses 3.9.5, 3.9.8 and 4.1(ii) as covering margin money, fixed deposits and temporary utilisation for foreclosure, but not creating any proprietary right over surplus generated while the corporate debtor remained under the Resolution Professional's control. In the absence of contractual allocation in the plan, the surplus retained its character as part of the insolvency estate and was directed to be distributed under Section 53. That direction was treated as addressing a matter not contemplated by the plan, not as modifying the approved resolution plan.
CIRP-generated surplus cash flow was held not to vest in the successful resolution applicant because the approved resolution plan contained no express provision dealing with that surplus. The Tribunal read clauses 3.9.5, 3.9.8 and 4.1(ii) as covering margin money, fixed deposits and temporary utilisation for foreclosure, but not creating any proprietary right over surplus generated while the corporate debtor remained under the Resolution Professional's control. In the absence of contractual allocation in the plan, the surplus retained its character as part of the insolvency estate and was directed to be distributed under Section 53. That direction was treated as addressing a matter not contemplated by the plan, not as modifying the approved resolution plan.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
