Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Mutual fund maturity rules require proper rollover, redemption, disclosure, and due diligence; investor gains cannot excuse regulatory breaches or pen...
Page of 4813
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1461 to 1480 of 96257 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Belated claims in CIRP cannot be reopened after CoC approval merely because plan approval by the Adjudicating Authority is pending, and refusal to condone delay was upheld where the claimant was a commercial entity and its claim was not reflected in the corporate debtor's records. The SARFAESI sale certificate preserved liability only for encumbrances expressly listed in Annexure 1, so no enforceable liability survived in favour of a claimant whose name was absent from that list. An allotment of units made in adjustment of legal fees, without any disbursement by the claimant, did not satisfy the requirement of disbursement against consideration for the time value of money and was not financial debt.
Belated claims in CIRP cannot be reopened after CoC approval merely because plan approval by the Adjudicating Authority is pending, and refusal to condone delay was upheld where the claimant was a commercial entity and its claim was not reflected in the corporate debtor's records. The SARFAESI sale certificate preserved liability only for encumbrances expressly listed in Annexure 1, so no enforceable liability survived in favour of a claimant whose name was absent from that list. An allotment of units made in adjustment of legal fees, without any disbursement by the claimant, did not satisfy the requirement of disbursement against consideration for the time value of money and was not financial debt.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.