Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
Belated claims in CIRP cannot be reopened after CoC approval merely because plan approval by the Adjudicating Authority is pending, and refusal to condone delay was upheld where the claimant was a commercial entity and its claim was not reflected in the corporate debtor's records. The SARFAESI sale certificate preserved liability only for encumbrances expressly listed in Annexure 1, so no enforceable liability survived in favour of a claimant whose name was absent from that list. An allotment of units made in adjustment of legal fees, without any disbursement by the claimant, did not satisfy the requirement of disbursement against consideration for the time value of money and was not financial debt.
Belated claims in CIRP cannot be reopened after CoC approval merely because plan approval by the Adjudicating Authority is pending, and refusal to condone delay was upheld where the claimant was a commercial entity and its claim was not reflected in the corporate debtor's records. The SARFAESI sale certificate preserved liability only for encumbrances expressly listed in Annexure 1, so no enforceable liability survived in favour of a claimant whose name was absent from that list. An allotment of units made in adjustment of legal fees, without any disbursement by the claimant, did not satisfy the requirement of disbursement against consideration for the time value of money and was not financial debt.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.