Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
721 to 740 of 96333 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Assessment orders passed nearly ten years after issuance of the initial Form-H notices were held unsustainable because Rule 25 requires completion within a reasonable period, even though it prescribes no fixed outer limit. Relying on the binding precedent in Siemens Limited, the Court found that such prolonged delay in adjudication was unreasonable and unjustifiable. As the impugned assessments in all three writ petitions were made after more than ten years, they were quashed and the petitions were allowed.
Assessment orders passed nearly ten years after issuance of the initial Form-H notices were held unsustainable because Rule 25 requires completion within a reasonable period, even though it prescribes no fixed outer limit. Relying on the binding precedent in Siemens Limited, the Court found that such prolonged delay in adjudication was unreasonable and unjustifiable. As the impugned assessments in all three writ petitions were made after more than ten years, they were quashed and the petitions were allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.