Scientific Research approval for Sikshya O Anusandhan under section 35(1)(ii) granted subject to reporting, certification, and compliance requirements...
A non-speaking order passed after de novo adjudication was quashed because the authority failed to consider the petitioner's submissions, despite an earlier remand requiring a fresh, reasoned decision after hearing all contentions. The Court applied the principle that an adjudicating authority must deal with the assessee's replies and cannot cure an earlier defect by issuing a bald order. As the same infirmity persisted in the second round, the matter was remanded for fresh consideration and a reasoned order in accordance with law, with all contentions kept open.
A non-speaking order passed after de novo adjudication was quashed because the authority failed to consider the petitioner's submissions, despite an earlier remand requiring a fresh, reasoned decision after hearing all contentions. The Court applied the principle that an adjudicating authority must deal with the assessee's replies and cannot cure an earlier defect by issuing a bald order. As the same infirmity persisted in the second round, the matter was remanded for fresh consideration and a reasoned order in accordance with law, with all contentions kept open.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
