Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Statutory appeals were rejected as time-barred because the delay exceeded the condonable period, and the High Court found no legal basis to interfere with that appellate rejection. The dispute concerned GST assessment orders arising from return mismatches, with intimations already issued, so no further interference was warranted on that record. However, on the petitioners' express consent, the Court directed fresh adjudication on merits after payment of the balance disputed tax or required disputed tax, as applicable, and filing replies with supporting documents; the impugned orders were treated as addenda to the show cause notices. Any bank attachment was to stand vacated only upon compliance with those conditions.
Statutory appeals were rejected as time-barred because the delay exceeded the condonable period, and the High Court found no legal basis to interfere with that appellate rejection. The dispute concerned GST assessment orders arising from return mismatches, with intimations already issued, so no further interference was warranted on that record. However, on the petitioners' express consent, the Court directed fresh adjudication on merits after payment of the balance disputed tax or required disputed tax, as applicable, and filing replies with supporting documents; the impugned orders were treated as addenda to the show cause notices. Any bank attachment was to stand vacated only upon compliance with those conditions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4819 
Join Channel 
