Reopening of assessment cannot rest solely on an audit party's opinion; reassessment under Section 147/148 is impermissible and power of revision shou...
Tested party selection: functional analysis identified the least complex unit as the appropriate tested party, altering the transfer pricing adjustmen...
Advances written off were held deductible only if the assessee proves they were advanced for business purposes, became irrecoverable, and satisfy the statutory conditions for bad debt or business loss; because complete particulars were not furnished, the matter was remanded for fresh verification. A claim for correct MAT credit carry forward was admitted in principle before the appellate authority, since a new claim may be raised absent a statutory bar, but computation was sent back for scrutiny. An appeal against a rectification order passed in an assessment made under DRP directions was held maintainable. The rectification dispute was also remitted for fresh consideration because proper opportunity was not given and additional evidence required examination.
Advances written off were held deductible only if the assessee proves they were advanced for business purposes, became irrecoverable, and satisfy the statutory conditions for bad debt or business loss; because complete particulars were not furnished, the matter was remanded for fresh verification. A claim for correct MAT credit carry forward was admitted in principle before the appellate authority, since a new claim may be raised absent a statutory bar, but computation was sent back for scrutiny. An appeal against a rectification order passed in an assessment made under DRP directions was held maintainable. The rectification dispute was also remitted for fresh consideration because proper opportunity was not given and additional evidence required examination.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.