Fraudulently obtained SEIS scrips cannot support customs exemption; recovery, confiscation and penalties were sustained, but employee penalty fell awa...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
5001 to 5020 of 96177 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Advances written off were held deductible only if the assessee proves they were advanced for business purposes, became irrecoverable, and satisfy the statutory conditions for bad debt or business loss; because complete particulars were not furnished, the matter was remanded for fresh verification. A claim for correct MAT credit carry forward was admitted in principle before the appellate authority, since a new claim may be raised absent a statutory bar, but computation was sent back for scrutiny. An appeal against a rectification order passed in an assessment made under DRP directions was held maintainable. The rectification dispute was also remitted for fresh consideration because proper opportunity was not given and additional evidence required examination.
Advances written off were held deductible only if the assessee proves they were advanced for business purposes, became irrecoverable, and satisfy the statutory conditions for bad debt or business loss; because complete particulars were not furnished, the matter was remanded for fresh verification. A claim for correct MAT credit carry forward was admitted in principle before the appellate authority, since a new claim may be raised absent a statutory bar, but computation was sent back for scrutiny. An appeal against a rectification order passed in an assessment made under DRP directions was held maintainable. The rectification dispute was also remitted for fresh consideration because proper opportunity was not given and additional evidence required examination.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.