Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Advances written off were held deductible only if the assessee proves they were advanced for business purposes, became irrecoverable, and satisfy the statutory conditions for bad debt or business loss; because complete particulars were not furnished, the matter was remanded for fresh verification. A claim for correct MAT credit carry forward was admitted in principle before the appellate authority, since a new claim may be raised absent a statutory bar, but computation was sent back for scrutiny. An appeal against a rectification order passed in an assessment made under DRP directions was held maintainable. The rectification dispute was also remitted for fresh consideration because proper opportunity was not given and additional evidence required examination.
Advances written off were held deductible only if the assessee proves they were advanced for business purposes, became irrecoverable, and satisfy the statutory conditions for bad debt or business loss; because complete particulars were not furnished, the matter was remanded for fresh verification. A claim for correct MAT credit carry forward was admitted in principle before the appellate authority, since a new claim may be raised absent a statutory bar, but computation was sent back for scrutiny. An appeal against a rectification order passed in an assessment made under DRP directions was held maintainable. The rectification dispute was also remitted for fresh consideration because proper opportunity was not given and additional evidence required examination.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.