Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
Goodwill arising from amalgamation of a running business was treated as a depreciable intangible asset because it represented commercial rights covered by the depreciation provision, and the Tribunal followed its earlier years' view in the absence of any change in facts or law. The deletion of disallowance of depreciation on goodwill was upheld. For captive power transfers, the Tribunal accepted the internal CUP benchmark based on the consumer tariff charged by the distribution company for valuing inter-unit electricity sales, holding that regulatory tariff was not the proper market benchmark. On that basis, the transfer pricing adjustment affecting the section 80IA deduction was deleted and the assessee's claim was sustained.
Goodwill arising from amalgamation of a running business was treated as a depreciable intangible asset because it represented commercial rights covered by the depreciation provision, and the Tribunal followed its earlier years' view in the absence of any change in facts or law. The deletion of disallowance of depreciation on goodwill was upheld. For captive power transfers, the Tribunal accepted the internal CUP benchmark based on the consumer tariff charged by the distribution company for valuing inter-unit electricity sales, holding that regulatory tariff was not the proper market benchmark. On that basis, the transfer pricing adjustment affecting the section 80IA deduction was deleted and the assessee's claim was sustained.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4816 
Join Channel 
