Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
721 to 740 of 96333 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Goodwill arising from amalgamation of a running business was treated as a depreciable intangible asset because it represented commercial rights covered by the depreciation provision, and the Tribunal followed its earlier years' view in the absence of any change in facts or law. The deletion of disallowance of depreciation on goodwill was upheld. For captive power transfers, the Tribunal accepted the internal CUP benchmark based on the consumer tariff charged by the distribution company for valuing inter-unit electricity sales, holding that regulatory tariff was not the proper market benchmark. On that basis, the transfer pricing adjustment affecting the section 80IA deduction was deleted and the assessee's claim was sustained.
Goodwill arising from amalgamation of a running business was treated as a depreciable intangible asset because it represented commercial rights covered by the depreciation provision, and the Tribunal followed its earlier years' view in the absence of any change in facts or law. The deletion of disallowance of depreciation on goodwill was upheld. For captive power transfers, the Tribunal accepted the internal CUP benchmark based on the consumer tariff charged by the distribution company for valuing inter-unit electricity sales, holding that regulatory tariff was not the proper market benchmark. On that basis, the transfer pricing adjustment affecting the section 80IA deduction was deleted and the assessee's claim was sustained.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.