Penalty for estimation of income and disallowances for tax non-deduction clarified: estimation-based penalties not sustainable; additions without conc...
Managerial remuneration disallowance under s.40A(2)(b) challenged over alleged tax-avoidance; appellate decision restored deletion of addition for dir...
Classification of imported goods as electronic cigarette versus tobacco product reversed for lack of proof; order set aside for jurisdictional overrea...
Deduction of tax at source was required on the full stated consideration for purchase of immovable property under section 194IA; treating only part of the payment as outside the statutory base did not displace the obligation, so the section 201 default finding was sustained for the balance land consideration. For the other TDS disallowances relating to provisions and expenses, the Tribunal found that additional evidence, including Form 16A and a statement of items where tax was allegedly deducted and remitted, required factual verification. Those items were remitted to the Assessing Officer for de novo examination with liberty to file further evidence, and the matter was left open on the default question.
Deduction of tax at source was required on the full stated consideration for purchase of immovable property under section 194IA; treating only part of the payment as outside the statutory base did not displace the obligation, so the section 201 default finding was sustained for the balance land consideration. For the other TDS disallowances relating to provisions and expenses, the Tribunal found that additional evidence, including Form 16A and a statement of items where tax was allegedly deducted and remitted, required factual verification. Those items were remitted to the Assessing Officer for de novo examination with liberty to file further evidence, and the matter was left open on the default question.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.