Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
Deduction of tax at source was required on the full stated consideration for purchase of immovable property under section 194IA; treating only part of the payment as outside the statutory base did not displace the obligation, so the section 201 default finding was sustained for the balance land consideration. For the other TDS disallowances relating to provisions and expenses, the Tribunal found that additional evidence, including Form 16A and a statement of items where tax was allegedly deducted and remitted, required factual verification. Those items were remitted to the Assessing Officer for de novo examination with liberty to file further evidence, and the matter was left open on the default question.
Deduction of tax at source was required on the full stated consideration for purchase of immovable property under section 194IA; treating only part of the payment as outside the statutory base did not displace the obligation, so the section 201 default finding was sustained for the balance land consideration. For the other TDS disallowances relating to provisions and expenses, the Tribunal found that additional evidence, including Form 16A and a statement of items where tax was allegedly deducted and remitted, required factual verification. Those items were remitted to the Assessing Officer for de novo examination with liberty to file further evidence, and the matter was left open on the default question.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.