Extended limitation requires willful misstatement or suppression with intent to evade; mere misclassification does not sustain confiscation or penalty...
Page of 4816
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
6021 to 6040 of 96301 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Deduction of tax at source was required on the full stated consideration for purchase of immovable property under section 194IA; treating only part of the payment as outside the statutory base did not displace the obligation, so the section 201 default finding was sustained for the balance land consideration. For the other TDS disallowances relating to provisions and expenses, the Tribunal found that additional evidence, including Form 16A and a statement of items where tax was allegedly deducted and remitted, required factual verification. Those items were remitted to the Assessing Officer for de novo examination with liberty to file further evidence, and the matter was left open on the default question.
Deduction of tax at source was required on the full stated consideration for purchase of immovable property under section 194IA; treating only part of the payment as outside the statutory base did not displace the obligation, so the section 201 default finding was sustained for the balance land consideration. For the other TDS disallowances relating to provisions and expenses, the Tribunal found that additional evidence, including Form 16A and a statement of items where tax was allegedly deducted and remitted, required factual verification. Those items were remitted to the Assessing Officer for de novo examination with liberty to file further evidence, and the matter was left open on the default question.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.