Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
Deduction of tax at source was required on the full stated consideration for purchase of immovable property under section 194IA; treating only part of the payment as outside the statutory base did not displace the obligation, so the section 201 default finding was sustained for the balance land consideration. For the other TDS disallowances relating to provisions and expenses, the Tribunal found that additional evidence, including Form 16A and a statement of items where tax was allegedly deducted and remitted, required factual verification. Those items were remitted to the Assessing Officer for de novo examination with liberty to file further evidence, and the matter was left open on the default question.
Deduction of tax at source was required on the full stated consideration for purchase of immovable property under section 194IA; treating only part of the payment as outside the statutory base did not displace the obligation, so the section 201 default finding was sustained for the balance land consideration. For the other TDS disallowances relating to provisions and expenses, the Tribunal found that additional evidence, including Form 16A and a statement of items where tax was allegedly deducted and remitted, required factual verification. Those items were remitted to the Assessing Officer for de novo examination with liberty to file further evidence, and the matter was left open on the default question.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.