Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
721 to 740 of 96333 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Provident fund claims in CIRP must rest on crystallised statutory dues; an internal communication or tentative computation cannot by itself establish an admissible claim. The Appellate Tribunal held that, where the provident fund liability had not been assessed and crystallised at the relevant time, the claim could not be sustained on the basis of a provisional document alone. The rejection of the application was therefore upheld and the appeal dismissed.
Provident fund claims in CIRP must rest on crystallised statutory dues; an internal communication or tentative computation cannot by itself establish an admissible claim. The Appellate Tribunal held that, where the provident fund liability had not been assessed and crystallised at the relevant time, the claim could not be sustained on the basis of a provisional document alone. The rejection of the application was therefore upheld and the appeal dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.