Proportionate interest, unexplained credits and partner remuneration disputed; proofs of fund nexus and lender identity were decisive and disallowance...
Capital gains valuation from stamp assessment versus net consideration for residential reinvestment: deemed stamp value replaced for gains but not for...
Provident fund claims in CIRP must rest on crystallised statutory dues; an internal communication or tentative computation cannot by itself establish an admissible claim. The Appellate Tribunal held that, where the provident fund liability had not been assessed and crystallised at the relevant time, the claim could not be sustained on the basis of a provisional document alone. The rejection of the application was therefore upheld and the appeal dismissed.
Provident fund claims in CIRP must rest on crystallised statutory dues; an internal communication or tentative computation cannot by itself establish an admissible claim. The Appellate Tribunal held that, where the provident fund liability had not been assessed and crystallised at the relevant time, the claim could not be sustained on the basis of a provisional document alone. The rejection of the application was therefore upheld and the appeal dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.