Certificate-of-origin verification procedure governs preferential customs benefits; denial without retroactive verification was set aside with consequ...
Disciplinary Committee jurisdiction and mandatory investigation requirements invalidated cancellation of an insolvency professional's registration and...
Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Page of 4811
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1341 to 1360 of 96208 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Anticipatory bail was granted in a GST investigation for alleged wrongful availment of input tax credit because the allegations rested mainly on documentary material, the relevant records had already been furnished, and no compelling basis for custodial interrogation was shown. The Court also relied on the petitioner's cooperation with the inquiry, absence of placed criminal antecedents, and deposit of the amount alleged to have been evaded. On that basis, arrest was found unwarranted, and pre-arrest protection was allowed subject to conditions requiring surrender, execution of bond, regular appearance, travel restriction, and full cooperation with the investigation.
Anticipatory bail was granted in a GST investigation for alleged wrongful availment of input tax credit because the allegations rested mainly on documentary material, the relevant records had already been furnished, and no compelling basis for custodial interrogation was shown. The Court also relied on the petitioner's cooperation with the inquiry, absence of placed criminal antecedents, and deposit of the amount alleged to have been evaded. On that basis, arrest was found unwarranted, and pre-arrest protection was allowed subject to conditions requiring surrender, execution of bond, regular appearance, travel restriction, and full cooperation with the investigation.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.