Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Joint development agreements defer taxable transfer where possession lacks part performance, while completed flats determine consideration and exempti...
Passenger baggage re-export requires true declaration and cannot be granted indirectly through discretionary redemption of undeclared prohibited goods...
Blocking of input tax credit could not be sustained where the impugned action rested solely on cancellation of GST registration and that registration was later restored. Once the cancellation ceased to exist, the foundation for blocking the credit disappeared, and the communication was liable to be withdrawn. The HC therefore quashed the blocking communication and held the petitioner entitled to utilise the input tax credit in accordance with law. Other contentions were not examined on merits and were left open.
Blocking of input tax credit could not be sustained where the impugned action rested solely on cancellation of GST registration and that registration was later restored. Once the cancellation ceased to exist, the foundation for blocking the credit disappeared, and the communication was liable to be withdrawn. The HC therefore quashed the blocking communication and held the petitioner entitled to utilise the input tax credit in accordance with law. Other contentions were not examined on merits and were left open.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4819 
Join Channel 
