Restriction of Input Tax Credit under Rule 86A applies only to fraudulently or ineligible availed credit; mere wrongful recipient availment is insuffi...
Business reorganisation requires recognition of successor's modified return; draft orders against dissolved transferor quashed and fresh review direct...
Pre-commencement R&D deduction denied where business had not commenced; deeming benefit requires tangible start of manufacture or commercial exploitat...
Blocking of input tax credit could not be sustained where the impugned action rested solely on cancellation of GST registration and that registration was later restored. Once the cancellation ceased to exist, the foundation for blocking the credit disappeared, and the communication was liable to be withdrawn. The HC therefore quashed the blocking communication and held the petitioner entitled to utilise the input tax credit in accordance with law. Other contentions were not examined on merits and were left open.
Blocking of input tax credit could not be sustained where the impugned action rested solely on cancellation of GST registration and that registration was later restored. Once the cancellation ceased to exist, the foundation for blocking the credit disappeared, and the communication was liable to be withdrawn. The HC therefore quashed the blocking communication and held the petitioner entitled to utilise the input tax credit in accordance with law. Other contentions were not examined on merits and were left open.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.