Retrospective application of beneficial circulars upheld, binding officers and granting post adjudication relief where adjudication occurred after cir...
Admissibility of Investigation Statements requires witness examination before the adjudicating authority; otherwise statements cannot sustain a penalt...
Transaction value and connected person treatment in excise valuation: proprietary concerns not inter connected undertakings, relief on valuation and c...
Appointment of Registrars as adjudicating officers under Companies Act reallocates territorial jurisdiction and sets appeal route to Regional Director...
DCF share valuation could not be discarded and replaced with another fair market value without first identifying a specific defect or non-compliance in the assessee's prescribed valuation report, so the addition for excess share premium under section 56(2)(vii)(b) was deleted. Protective assessment was confined to cases of doubt about the correct person chargeable to tax; where both additions were made in the same assessee's hands in the same year under different heads, that basis did not apply, so the section 68 protective addition was also deleted. The appeal was allowed.
DCF share valuation could not be discarded and replaced with another fair market value without first identifying a specific defect or non-compliance in the assessee's prescribed valuation report, so the addition for excess share premium under section 56(2)(vii)(b) was deleted. Protective assessment was confined to cases of doubt about the correct person chargeable to tax; where both additions were made in the same assessee's hands in the same year under different heads, that basis did not apply, so the section 68 protective addition was also deleted. The appeal was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4821 
Join Channel 
