Permanent Establishment and Business Connection: foreign consultancy receipts not attributable where no fixed base or corporate veil piercing establis...
Limitation period commencement and procedural inquiry rules: identity-based limitation upheld; complaints by authorised public servants need not attra...
DCF share valuation could not be discarded and replaced with another fair market value without first identifying a specific defect or non-compliance in the assessee's prescribed valuation report, so the addition for excess share premium under section 56(2)(vii)(b) was deleted. Protective assessment was confined to cases of doubt about the correct person chargeable to tax; where both additions were made in the same assessee's hands in the same year under different heads, that basis did not apply, so the section 68 protective addition was also deleted. The appeal was allowed.
DCF share valuation could not be discarded and replaced with another fair market value without first identifying a specific defect or non-compliance in the assessee's prescribed valuation report, so the addition for excess share premium under section 56(2)(vii)(b) was deleted. Protective assessment was confined to cases of doubt about the correct person chargeable to tax; where both additions were made in the same assessee's hands in the same year under different heads, that basis did not apply, so the section 68 protective addition was also deleted. The appeal was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4814 
Join Channel 
