Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
An assessee-company's residential status for tax purposes had to be determined on the factual and legal basis for locating its place of effective management, not on the institutional status of the authority that earlier considered the matter. The Tribunal found that the material showing effective control was not exercised abroad had merit, and that the Assessing Officer had not rebutted the factual foundation relied on to place POEM in India. As the first appellate authority accepted that the collegium's basis lacked merit, it could not sustain the assessment merely because it was reluctant to differ from that collegium. The POEM finding in India was therefore unsustainable, and the global income addition was deleted.
An assessee-company's residential status for tax purposes had to be determined on the factual and legal basis for locating its place of effective management, not on the institutional status of the authority that earlier considered the matter. The Tribunal found that the material showing effective control was not exercised abroad had merit, and that the Assessing Officer had not rebutted the factual foundation relied on to place POEM in India. As the first appellate authority accepted that the collegium's basis lacked merit, it could not sustain the assessment merely because it was reluctant to differ from that collegium. The POEM finding in India was therefore unsustainable, and the global income addition was deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
