Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
An assessee-company's residential status for tax purposes had to be determined on the factual and legal basis for locating its place of effective management, not on the institutional status of the authority that earlier considered the matter. The Tribunal found that the material showing effective control was not exercised abroad had merit, and that the Assessing Officer had not rebutted the factual foundation relied on to place POEM in India. As the first appellate authority accepted that the collegium's basis lacked merit, it could not sustain the assessment merely because it was reluctant to differ from that collegium. The POEM finding in India was therefore unsustainable, and the global income addition was deleted.
An assessee-company's residential status for tax purposes had to be determined on the factual and legal basis for locating its place of effective management, not on the institutional status of the authority that earlier considered the matter. The Tribunal found that the material showing effective control was not exercised abroad had merit, and that the Assessing Officer had not rebutted the factual foundation relied on to place POEM in India. As the first appellate authority accepted that the collegium's basis lacked merit, it could not sustain the assessment merely because it was reluctant to differ from that collegium. The POEM finding in India was therefore unsustainable, and the global income addition was deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.