Opportunity to respond to jurisdictional reports is mandatory before customs settlement duty enhancement; connected applications require consistent ad...
Specific customs headings for scaffolding components prevail over general classification, invalidating misclassification proceedings and enabling with...
Liquidator appointment under Section 34 requires consideration of creditor recommendations, valid professional authorisation, and preservation of vali...
Income-tax exemption for specified regulatory fees and government grants applies subject to non-commercial activity and continuing compliance conditio...
Digital accessibility audit and remediation deadlines extended, while all other disability-compliance obligations for regulated entities remain unchan...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
621 to 640 of 96047 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Imported food seasoning material was held classifiable under CTI 3302 10 10 as a mixture based on odoriferous substances. The Tribunal found that Heading 3302 covers mixtures of odoriferous substances, or mixtures with a basis of one or more such substances, and that the presence of parsley, spearmint and paprika oleoresin satisfied that description. It rejected the view that an odoriferous substance must be the main or predominant constituent, holding that the HSN Explanatory Notes do not impose such a requirement. The reclassification under CTI 2103 90 40 was therefore unsustainable and the appeal was allowed.
Imported food seasoning material was held classifiable under CTI 3302 10 10 as a mixture based on odoriferous substances. The Tribunal found that Heading 3302 covers mixtures of odoriferous substances, or mixtures with a basis of one or more such substances, and that the presence of parsley, spearmint and paprika oleoresin satisfied that description. It rejected the view that an odoriferous substance must be the main or predominant constituent, holding that the HSN Explanatory Notes do not impose such a requirement. The reclassification under CTI 2103 90 40 was therefore unsustainable and the appeal was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.