Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Page of 4801
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
341 to 360 of 96001 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Imported food seasoning material was held classifiable under CTI 3302 10 10 as a mixture based on odoriferous substances. The Tribunal found that Heading 3302 covers mixtures of odoriferous substances, or mixtures with a basis of one or more such substances, and that the presence of parsley, spearmint and paprika oleoresin satisfied that description. It rejected the view that an odoriferous substance must be the main or predominant constituent, holding that the HSN Explanatory Notes do not impose such a requirement. The reclassification under CTI 2103 90 40 was therefore unsustainable and the appeal was allowed.
Imported food seasoning material was held classifiable under CTI 3302 10 10 as a mixture based on odoriferous substances. The Tribunal found that Heading 3302 covers mixtures of odoriferous substances, or mixtures with a basis of one or more such substances, and that the presence of parsley, spearmint and paprika oleoresin satisfied that description. It rejected the view that an odoriferous substance must be the main or predominant constituent, holding that the HSN Explanatory Notes do not impose such a requirement. The reclassification under CTI 2103 90 40 was therefore unsustainable and the appeal was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
