Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
A report under sections 206 to 208 of the Companies Act, 2013 must rest on a lawful inquiry or inspection, with the company first informed in writing of the allegations and given an opportunity to explain; here, no notices under section 206 were issued and the report itself showed that a fresh inspection was needed, so the report was ex facie illegal and was quashed. An SFIO investigation under section 212 requires material disclosing fraud, meaning conduct involving intent to deceive or gain undue advantage; persistent repayment defaults and related complaints, without more, did not establish fraud or a jurisdictional basis for SFIO action. The SFIO order, and the consequential summons and notices, were also quashed.
A report under sections 206 to 208 of the Companies Act, 2013 must rest on a lawful inquiry or inspection, with the company first informed in writing of the allegations and given an opportunity to explain; here, no notices under section 206 were issued and the report itself showed that a fresh inspection was needed, so the report was ex facie illegal and was quashed. An SFIO investigation under section 212 requires material disclosing fraud, meaning conduct involving intent to deceive or gain undue advantage; persistent repayment defaults and related complaints, without more, did not establish fraud or a jurisdictional basis for SFIO action. The SFIO order, and the consequential summons and notices, were also quashed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
