Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Under the second proviso to Section 25-A(1), a rectification application received by the Assessing Authority and not rejected within sixty days is deemed allowed by legal fiction, and the later rectification order cannot override that statutory effect. The High Court held that the assessee's application received on 22.01.2010 stood allowed on expiry of sixty days, rendering the subsequent rectification and all consequential revisional, fresh assessment, refund and appellate proceedings without jurisdiction. On refund interest, the Court held that the right under Section 13-A accrued after expiry of ninety days from the deemed rectification date, and the assessee was entitled to interest at 6% per annum for the determined delay period.
Under the second proviso to Section 25-A(1), a rectification application received by the Assessing Authority and not rejected within sixty days is deemed allowed by legal fiction, and the later rectification order cannot override that statutory effect. The High Court held that the assessee's application received on 22.01.2010 stood allowed on expiry of sixty days, rendering the subsequent rectification and all consequential revisional, fresh assessment, refund and appellate proceedings without jurisdiction. On refund interest, the Court held that the right under Section 13-A accrued after expiry of ninety days from the deemed rectification date, and the assessee was entitled to interest at 6% per annum for the determined delay period.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
