Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Highlights - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Income Tax
  • Direct Taxes
  • Benami Property
  • Central GST Laws
  • SGST - State GST Laws
  • Customs
  • FTP - Foreign Trade Policy
  • SEZ - Special Economic Zone
  • FEMA - Foreign Exchange Management
  • Companies Law
  • SEBI - Securities & Exchange Board of India
  • IBC - Insolvency and Bankruptcy
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA - Money-Laundering
  • Indian Laws
  • Bill / Finance Bills
  • Wealth Tax
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Month:
---- All Months ----
  • ---- All Months ----
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
Year:
---- All Years ----
  • ---- All Years ----
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
    ECIR under PML Act is not automatic on a predicate offence; enforcement satisfaction must be independently recorded.
    Continuing money-laundering and proceeds-of-crime attachment upheld despite pre-2009 acquisition and third-party ownership claims
    Provisional attachment and equivalent value seizure upheld under money-laundering law, despite interim relief in the predicate case.
    SEZ subcontracted services qualify for exemption, while non-SEZ tax demands, interest and fresh credit verification were sustained
    Provisional liquidator control defeats cheque liability where dishonour is for account blocked, not insufficiency of funds.
    Input tax credit time-limit amendment required fresh adjudication; garnishee proceedings could not survive the quashed order.
    Statutory regulatory functions are not taxable business activity, and fees for such quasi-judicial work fall outside service tax and GST.
    E-commerce tax notice quashed for misapplying tax collection, input tax credit reversal, and fraud-based demand provisions.
    Deduction under section 80P(2)(d) upheld for interest earned by a co-operative society from a co-operative bank.
    GST circular relief for invoice errors extended to financial year 2019-20; adjudication order quashed and remand ordered.
    Anti-profiteering under GST requires passing on ITC benefit to buyers through price reduction, with interest and penalty exposure.
    Rebuttable anti-profiteering presumption requires consideration of market forces and input costs; report remanded for fresh investigation.
    Bakery goods and restaurant service can be taxed differently from the same premises if supplies and records are kept separate.
    Section 263 revision upheld where non-allocation of Head Office expenses showed lack of inquiry in deduction computation.
    Finality under the Vivad se Vishwas scheme bars rectification of a determined order under the Income-tax Act.
    Penalty for non-compliance with notice was deleted after later compliance was accepted and assessment was completed on the material filed.
    Concessional tax rate under section 115BAA allowed despite delayed Form 10-IC where option was disclosed and processed.
    Section 80P deduction cannot be denied for belated return filing where section 80AC(ii) was not yet applicable.
    Limited risk service provider analysis leads to deletion of transfer pricing adjustment and acceptance of TNMM benchmarking.
    Merger of intimation with scrutiny assessment rendered the appeal infructuous and led to dismissal.
❯❯
MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

    +

    Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

    NOTE:

    Highlights
    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
    Results Found:
    Show All SummariesHide All Summaries

    Highlights

    Back

    All Highlights

    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
      No Records Found

      Highlights

      Back

      All Highlights

      whatsappJoin Channel
      Showing Results for : Reset Filters

      The HC held that Notification No. 14/2022-Central Tax amending...

      Retrospective application of amended refund formula secures inverted duty structure refund under the CGST regime

      Contents
      Summary
      Note

      Note

      -

      Bookmark

      Print

      Print

      GSTApril 27, 2026Case LawsHC
      The HC held that Notification No. 14/2022-Central Tax amending Rule 89(5) of the CGST Rules had to be applied even to refund applications filed before 5 July 2022, following the final view in Ascent Meditech Ltd. The appellate authority's failure to consider that notification and the related clarification rendered its rejection of the refund claims unsustainable. On a composite reading of Section 54(3) and the Rules, the petitioner was entitled to refund of accumulated input tax credit arising from the inverted duty structure, and the original and appellate rejection orders were quashed.

      Topics

      ActsIncome Tax