Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
Page of 4814
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
901 to 920 of 96262 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Actuarial provisions for employee benefits were treated as ascertained liabilities where the scheme existed and valuation was independently supported by actuarial assumptions, so the Bhavishya Kalyan Yojana provision was allowable under section 37(1) on the net claim revised by the assessee. The Tribunal also allowed the additional deduction for the Medicare Scheme actuarial loss disclosed in Other Comprehensive Income, because the facts were already on record and it related to the same employee benefit obligation. For salary and other expense provisions, disallowance for alleged non-deduction of tax at source was largely deleted where tax had been deducted under section 192 or no deduction was required; residual items were remanded for verification.
Actuarial provisions for employee benefits were treated as ascertained liabilities where the scheme existed and valuation was independently supported by actuarial assumptions, so the Bhavishya Kalyan Yojana provision was allowable under section 37(1) on the net claim revised by the assessee. The Tribunal also allowed the additional deduction for the Medicare Scheme actuarial loss disclosed in Other Comprehensive Income, because the facts were already on record and it related to the same employee benefit obligation. For salary and other expense provisions, disallowance for alleged non-deduction of tax at source was largely deleted where tax had been deducted under section 192 or no deduction was required; residual items were remanded for verification.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.