Composite GST notices, mandatory limitation, and same-subject bar: HC upheld valid notices but quashed overlapping proceedings and unauthorised withho...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3221 to 3240 of 96047 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Actuarial provisions for employee benefits were treated as ascertained liabilities where the scheme existed and valuation was independently supported by actuarial assumptions, so the Bhavishya Kalyan Yojana provision was allowable under section 37(1) on the net claim revised by the assessee. The Tribunal also allowed the additional deduction for the Medicare Scheme actuarial loss disclosed in Other Comprehensive Income, because the facts were already on record and it related to the same employee benefit obligation. For salary and other expense provisions, disallowance for alleged non-deduction of tax at source was largely deleted where tax had been deducted under section 192 or no deduction was required; residual items were remanded for verification.
Actuarial provisions for employee benefits were treated as ascertained liabilities where the scheme existed and valuation was independently supported by actuarial assumptions, so the Bhavishya Kalyan Yojana provision was allowable under section 37(1) on the net claim revised by the assessee. The Tribunal also allowed the additional deduction for the Medicare Scheme actuarial loss disclosed in Other Comprehensive Income, because the facts were already on record and it related to the same employee benefit obligation. For salary and other expense provisions, disallowance for alleged non-deduction of tax at source was largely deleted where tax had been deducted under section 192 or no deduction was required; residual items were remanded for verification.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
