Educational approval requires mandatory State registration, but incidental surplus and trustee-owned land do not prove private benefit or profit motiv...
Judicial review of settlement orders cannot reopen settled customs notices, while statutory interest remains subject to verification and quantificatio...
Customs Broker licence lending for consideration justified revocation where exporter authorisation and client verification obligations were also breac...
Fraudulent import documents suspend limitation protection, while redemption of confiscated goods requires duty and interest despite bona fide purchase...
ODR arbitration participation remains mandatory after failed conciliation, while jurisdictional and maintainability objections stay available before t...
Transparency in technical bid evaluation requires disclosed standards and recorded reasons; opaque scoring invalidated tender awards and required fres...
Automated export obligation extensions remove separate regional applications after committee approval for Advance Authorisation and EPCG authorisation...
Page of 4807
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
21 to 40 of 96136 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Delayed filing of SIMS and LMPC certificates was treated as a procedural import-compliance lapse because the certificates were eventually produced and the record did not show mala fide intent or intent to evade. On that basis, the redemption fine and penalty under section 112(a)(i) were moderated, with the fine reduced to Rs. 1,00,000 and the penalty reduced to Rs. 50,000. Penalty under section 114AA was set aside because that provision applies only to knowingly or intentionally false or incorrect documents or statements, and no evidence established such knowledge or intent.
Delayed filing of SIMS and LMPC certificates was treated as a procedural import-compliance lapse because the certificates were eventually produced and the record did not show mala fide intent or intent to evade. On that basis, the redemption fine and penalty under section 112(a)(i) were moderated, with the fine reduced to Rs. 1,00,000 and the penalty reduced to Rs. 50,000. Penalty under section 114AA was set aside because that provision applies only to knowingly or intentionally false or incorrect documents or statements, and no evidence established such knowledge or intent.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.