Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Highlights - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Income Tax
  • Direct Taxes
  • Benami Property
  • Central GST Laws
  • SGST - State GST Laws
  • Customs
  • FTP - Foreign Trade Policy
  • SEZ - Special Economic Zone
  • FEMA - Foreign Exchange Management
  • Companies Law
  • SEBI - Securities & Exchange Board of India
  • IBC - Insolvency and Bankruptcy
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA - Money-Laundering
  • Indian Laws
  • Bill / Finance Bills
  • Wealth Tax
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Month:
---- All Months ----
  • ---- All Months ----
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
Year:
---- All Years ----
  • ---- All Years ----
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
Relevance Default Date
    Penalty for Non Compliance with Notice: upheld where assessee failed to prove bona fide reasonable cause, so penalties sustained.
    Assessment in earlier name upheld where assessee's communications sustained AO's bona fide belief; share premium additions sustained.
    DTAA capital gains: derivatives are distinct from shares, so trading gains are taxable in the resident state, not as share alienation.
    Reopening of assessment requires objective material with a live nexus to escapement; mere borrowed information or fund rotation is insufficient.
    Deduction under 80G: CSR-funded donations meeting statutory conditions and routed via banking channels remain deductible.
    Rejection of books of account in derivative trading overturned; turnover based fixed profit estimate found unreasonable and deleted.
    Revenue recognition for service contracts must use the straight-line method, so AMC receipts are recognised over the contract period.
    Rectification under section 154 without reasons or hearing is unsustainable; deduction under section 10AA must be restored.
    TDS credit verification: credits shown in Form 26AS or supported by evidence and indemnity may be allowed only after AO verification.
    Admissibility of Section 108 statements upheld; corroborative forensic digital evidence sustained confiscation and penalties despite parity claim.
    Dutiable goods exclude items subject only to IGST, so SEZ-to-DTA computer clearances cannot be treated as personal imports under 9804.
    Due Diligence Requirement for Customs Brokers - regulatory penalty set aside where parallel proceedings were dropped and importer granted relief.
    Use of Import Export Code by third parties and false declarations attracts confiscation and customs penalties.
    Interpretative classification negates willful suppression, leading to penalties under customs penalty law being set aside.
    Limitation on Customs show cause notices: extended period unavailable where department had prior knowledge, so SCN held time barred.
    Anticipatory Bail granted on conditions balancing presumption of innocence with investigative needs; passport surrender and regular attendance require...
    Insolvency eligibility: see-through analysis of de facto control found applicant disqualified, CIRP to continue pending inquiry.
    Presumption of Service: deemed Form B notice and concealment of developments led to dismissal and costs imposed.
    Mitigation for delayed adjudication reduces penalty though contravention established by documentary and corroborative evidence.
    Civil penalty liability under FEMA: mens rea not required; penalty reduced and pre-deposit to be adjusted accordingly.
❯❯
Maximize Maximize Maximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

+

Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

NOTE:

Highlights
Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
Results Found:
Show All Summaries Hide All Summaries

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
No Records Found

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

whatsapp Join Channel
Showing Results for : Reset Filters

Imported Extraneal Peritoneal Dialysis Solution with 7.5%...

Classification of peritoneal dialysis solution upheld under CTH 9018; binding precedent in the assessee's own case controlled the dispute.

Contents
Summary
Note

Note

-

Bookmark

Print

Print

Customs April 27, 2026 Case Laws AT
Imported Extraneal Peritoneal Dialysis Solution with 7.5% Icodestrin was held correctly classifiable under CTH 9018. The Tribunal followed the Supreme Court-backed classification already accepted in the appellant's own earlier case and found that the attempt to distinguish that binding precedent was untenable because the same product and classification dispute had already been examined on the relevant facts. It also noted that Delhi and Kolkata Benches had taken the same view, making the controversy no longer res integra. The contrary classification in the impugned order was rejected, the order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with consequential benefits according to law.

Topics

Acts Income Tax