Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Highlights - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Income Tax
  • Direct Taxes
  • Benami Property
  • Central GST Laws
  • SGST - State GST Laws
  • Customs
  • FTP - Foreign Trade Policy
  • SEZ - Special Economic Zone
  • FEMA - Foreign Exchange Management
  • Companies Law
  • SEBI - Securities & Exchange Board of India
  • IBC - Insolvency and Bankruptcy
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA - Money-Laundering
  • Indian Laws
  • Bill / Finance Bills
  • Wealth Tax
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Month:
---- All Months ----
  • ---- All Months ----
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
Year:
---- All Years ----
  • ---- All Years ----
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
    Section 7 insolvency cannot be used for coercive recovery where a quadripartite transaction is predominantly contractual.
    Limitation under Section 14 extends to prior IBC proceedings barred by pre-existing dispute, keeping the civil suit timely.
    Limitation under insolvency appeals starts from open-court pronouncement, with no condonation beyond the statutory outer limit.
    Project completion and CoC approval in insolvency: NCLAT rejects one promoter proposal, permits another subject to creditor consent.
    FEMA export proceeds and hearsay evidence defeated the commission-related contravention in independent enforcement proceedings.
    FEMA reporting compliance: timely FC-GPR filing with the authorised dealer defeated the penalty where bank delay caused transmission lapse.
    Corporate guarantee without consideration is not taxable as a supply of service, though the GST valuation challenge failed.
    GST appeal limitation and writ condonation fail where no exceptional circumstances justify delay
    Provisional attachment and parallel proceedings: writ challenge failed for lack of foundational facts and statutory post-decisional remedy.
    Alternative remedy and disputed facts led the High Court to decline writ interference in an input tax credit matter.
    Personal hearing requirement under GST natural justice led to quashing of an ex parte assessment order
    Deemed withdrawal of GST assessment ends garnishee recovery once returns are filed and dues are paid, subject to verification.
    GST on leasehold rights and land development cost upheld as taxable supply of service
    TDS on land acquisition compensation barred where arbitral award crystallises into a judgment debt payable in full
    Revision under section 263 turns on whether assessment enquiry was made, not a substantial question of law.
    Maintainability is for the Court, not the Registry; petitions must be numbered subject to maintainability and placed before the roster Bench.
    Unexplained money additions fail where presumptions replace corroborative enquiry and independent evidence in cash payment disputes.
    On-money, gifts and seized assets: ITAT applied section 69A limits, allowed telescoping, and recalculated capital gains.
    Prior recorded satisfaction is required before penalty under section 271D can be validly initiated and levied.
    Foreign commission expenditure disallowed for lack of genuineness, with limited relief granted to avoid double taxation on later write-back.
❯❯
MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

    +

    Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

    NOTE:

    Highlights
    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
    Results Found:
    Show All SummariesHide All Summaries

    Highlights

    Back

    All Highlights

    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
      No Records Found

      Highlights

      Back

      All Highlights

      whatsappJoin Channel
      Showing Results for : Reset Filters

      Imported Extraneal Peritoneal Dialysis Solution with 7.5%...

      Classification of peritoneal dialysis solution upheld under CTH 9018; binding precedent in the assessee's own case controlled the dispute.

      Contents
      Summary
      Note

      Note

      -

      Bookmark

      Print

      Print

      CustomsApril 27, 2026Case LawsAT
      Imported Extraneal Peritoneal Dialysis Solution with 7.5% Icodestrin was held correctly classifiable under CTH 9018. The Tribunal followed the Supreme Court-backed classification already accepted in the appellant's own earlier case and found that the attempt to distinguish that binding precedent was untenable because the same product and classification dispute had already been examined on the relevant facts. It also noted that Delhi and Kolkata Benches had taken the same view, making the controversy no longer res integra. The contrary classification in the impugned order was rejected, the order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with consequential benefits according to law.

      Topics

      ActsIncome Tax