Specified regulatory authority income receives conditional tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income character, and return f...
Tax exemption for regulatory authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-filing...
Input tax credit conditions remain constitutionally valid, with eligible recipient claims considered under GST circulars and retrospective filing dead...
Bogus donation receipts justified commission income assessment and defeated political-party tax exemption for inaccurate accounts and reporting failur...
Pure reimbursement without income element escapes tax withholding, while delayed withholding and unsupported provisions face deferred or renewed scrut...
Public benefit requirement defeats charitable registration where residents' association services are reciprocal, member-only facilities governed by mu...
Forensic audit expenses incurred in aid of the Asset Disposal Committee's asset-disposal functions were treated as incidental and therefore payable by the Committee, including the fees of the Chartered Accountant firm engaged for that purpose. The Court also directed the Union of India to frame a reimbursement mechanism if sale realisations ultimately fall short of the amounts raised through the scheme. In the investor restitution framework, the Court permitted SDMS to be engaged to ensure continuity and speed, ordered transfer of website credentials, digital records and updated application materials from WEBEL, and issued consequential directions for further action against assets not yet attached or not in the physical possession of the Enforcement Directorate.
Forensic audit expenses incurred in aid of the Asset Disposal Committee's asset-disposal functions were treated as incidental and therefore payable by the Committee, including the fees of the Chartered Accountant firm engaged for that purpose. The Court also directed the Union of India to frame a reimbursement mechanism if sale realisations ultimately fall short of the amounts raised through the scheme. In the investor restitution framework, the Court permitted SDMS to be engaged to ensure continuity and speed, ordered transfer of website credentials, digital records and updated application materials from WEBEL, and issued consequential directions for further action against assets not yet attached or not in the physical possession of the Enforcement Directorate.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.