Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
Page of 4814
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
901 to 920 of 96262 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Forensic audit expenses incurred in aid of the Asset Disposal Committee's asset-disposal functions were treated as incidental and therefore payable by the Committee, including the fees of the Chartered Accountant firm engaged for that purpose. The Court also directed the Union of India to frame a reimbursement mechanism if sale realisations ultimately fall short of the amounts raised through the scheme. In the investor restitution framework, the Court permitted SDMS to be engaged to ensure continuity and speed, ordered transfer of website credentials, digital records and updated application materials from WEBEL, and issued consequential directions for further action against assets not yet attached or not in the physical possession of the Enforcement Directorate.
Forensic audit expenses incurred in aid of the Asset Disposal Committee's asset-disposal functions were treated as incidental and therefore payable by the Committee, including the fees of the Chartered Accountant firm engaged for that purpose. The Court also directed the Union of India to frame a reimbursement mechanism if sale realisations ultimately fall short of the amounts raised through the scheme. In the investor restitution framework, the Court permitted SDMS to be engaged to ensure continuity and speed, ordered transfer of website credentials, digital records and updated application materials from WEBEL, and issued consequential directions for further action against assets not yet attached or not in the physical possession of the Enforcement Directorate.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.