Genuineness of investment evidence determines LTCG entitlement; non specific regulatory reports cannot displace transaction specific documentary proof...
Page of 4816
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
5881 to 5900 of 96301 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Entitlement to reimbursement of differential GST under a government contract was not decided on merits. The Court accepted the respondents' position that a mere assertion of tax payment was insufficient and that supporting documents evidencing actual payment or deposit of GST were required. It directed the petitioner to furnish proof of GST payment and ordered the respondents to examine the reimbursement claim and pass a reasoned decision in accordance with law within the stipulated time. No final adjudication was made on the substantive right to reimbursement.
Entitlement to reimbursement of differential GST under a government contract was not decided on merits. The Court accepted the respondents' position that a mere assertion of tax payment was insufficient and that supporting documents evidencing actual payment or deposit of GST were required. It directed the petitioner to furnish proof of GST payment and ordered the respondents to examine the reimbursement claim and pass a reasoned decision in accordance with law within the stipulated time. No final adjudication was made on the substantive right to reimbursement.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4816 
Join Channel 
