Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Highlights - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Income Tax
  • Direct Taxes
  • Benami Property
  • Central GST Laws
  • SGST - State GST Laws
  • Customs
  • FTP - Foreign Trade Policy
  • SEZ - Special Economic Zone
  • FEMA - Foreign Exchange Management
  • Companies Law
  • SEBI - Securities & Exchange Board of India
  • IBC - Insolvency and Bankruptcy
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA - Money-Laundering
  • Indian Laws
  • Bill / Finance Bills
  • Wealth Tax
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Month:
---- All Months ----
  • ---- All Months ----
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
Year:
---- All Years ----
  • ---- All Years ----
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
    Speaking order on objections to reopening is mandatory before reassessment; failure renders the notice and reassessment invalid.
    Bright Line Test cannot support AMP transfer pricing adjustment; bonus and tax credit issues were remitted for verification
    Treaty tie-break residency needs fuller factual verification where personal and economic ties point to different jurisdictions.
    Recorded bank credits cannot be taxed as unexplained money where books and documents explain the source; reassessment fails on wrong facts.
    Limited scrutiny cannot justify an addition on property purchase without valid conversion to complete scrutiny.
    Charitable status is not lost merely because a trust refers to a community when public benefit also exists.
    Section 263 revision barred where penalty proceedings were already initiated and only the invoked penalty provision was sought to be changed.
    Section 144C draft assessment breach found jurisdictional; final order, demand notice and penalty notice quashed.
    Digital signature requirement for e-proceedings assessments: manually signed order held invalid and assessment quashed.
    Gratuity deduction under section 43B allowed where audited records and supporting ledgers proved actual payment.
    TNMM comparability requires idle capacity and working capital adjustments to reflect ramp-up conditions and actual operating cycle.
    Limitation barred customs enforcement of a continuing exemption condition, making confiscation and consequential penalty unsustainable.
    Limitation bars customs penalty despite rescinded exemption notification where show cause notice was issued beyond the statutory period.
    Exemption notification conditions cannot be expanded by DGH certificate terms; SEZ clearance after use treated as export.
    Liquidation abates pending appeal when no continuation application is filed by the official liquidator under Rule 22.
    Classification of clear float glass with absorbent layer follows binding precedent, supporting exemption and remand for fresh adjudication.
    Advance ruling barred by pending classification dispute; end use could not override tariff-based classification of Lithium Ion Cells.
    Advance ruling on ongoing imports upheld; EV communication controllers classified under CTI 8517 62 90, but origin-based duty benefit denied.
    Liquidation sale prevails over belated VAT claims; statutory charge alone does not create secured creditor status under insolvency law.
    REIT eligibility and credit-risk rules relaxed by lowering the benchmark and widening the permitted risk class.
❯❯
MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

    +

    Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

    NOTE:

    Highlights
    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
    Results Found:
    Show All SummariesHide All Summaries

    Highlights

    Back

    All Highlights

    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
      No Records Found

      Highlights

      Back

      All Highlights

      whatsappJoin Channel
      Showing Results for : Reset Filters

      Reimbursement of actual staff salary cost from a project office...

      Reimbursement between project office and head office is a payment to self and not taxable fees for technical services.

      Contents
      Summary
      Note

      Note

      -

      Bookmark

      Print

      Print

      Income TaxApril 25, 2026Case LawsAT
      Reimbursement of actual staff salary cost from a project office to its head office, with no mark-up, was treated as a payment to self because both formed parts of the same enterprise. On that reasoning, no taxable income arose from the internal allocation, and the amount could not be assessed separately as fees for technical services. The Tribunal followed its earlier view that a transaction between the project office and head office did not generate income in the absence of any element of profit. The addition was deleted for both assessment years.

      Topics

      ActsIncome Tax