Retrospective application of beneficial circulars upheld, binding officers and granting post adjudication relief where adjudication occurred after cir...
Admissibility of Investigation Statements requires witness examination before the adjudicating authority; otherwise statements cannot sustain a penalt...
Transaction value and connected person treatment in excise valuation: proprietary concerns not inter connected undertakings, relief on valuation and c...
Appointment of Registrars as adjudicating officers under Companies Act reallocates territorial jurisdiction and sets appeal route to Regional Director...
Composite supply of drilling services and site specific chemicals characterised as composite supply; prior advance rulings set aside, tax rate left op...
Page of 4819
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
6361 to 6380 of 96365 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
In a transfer pricing dispute over specified domestic transactions for purchase of potatoes from an associated enterprise, the Tribunal held that the earlier coordinate bench ruling in the assessee's own case for the preceding year governed the issue on identical facts. Applying judicial discipline, it rejected the DRP's attempt to keep the matter open for the Revenue and found that CUP was not the most appropriate method. TNMM was upheld as the appropriate arm's length method, so the transfer pricing adjustment based on CUP was deleted. As the substantive addition did not survive, the consequential penalty proceedings for alleged under-reporting or misreporting under section 270A were rendered infructuous.
In a transfer pricing dispute over specified domestic transactions for purchase of potatoes from an associated enterprise, the Tribunal held that the earlier coordinate bench ruling in the assessee's own case for the preceding year governed the issue on identical facts. Applying judicial discipline, it rejected the DRP's attempt to keep the matter open for the Revenue and found that CUP was not the most appropriate method. TNMM was upheld as the appropriate arm's length method, so the transfer pricing adjustment based on CUP was deleted. As the substantive addition did not survive, the consequential penalty proceedings for alleged under-reporting or misreporting under section 270A were rendered infructuous.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4819 
Join Channel 
