Composite GST notices, mandatory limitation, and same-subject bar: HC upheld valid notices but quashed overlapping proceedings and unauthorised withho...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3221 to 3240 of 96047 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Jurisdiction under section 153C failed because the seized diaries and notebooks were recovered from a third person, did not name the assessee, and contained no identifying material conclusively linking the code "DD" to him. Corroboration from a contact saved as "DD Personal", Truecaller data and other digital material was held too tenuous to supply the missing nexus. Presumptions under sections 132(4A) and 292C were confined to the person from whom the documents were found and could not be transposed to the assessee without independent evidence. The notice, consequential assessment and addition were therefore unsustainable, and the Revenue's appeal was dismissed.
Jurisdiction under section 153C failed because the seized diaries and notebooks were recovered from a third person, did not name the assessee, and contained no identifying material conclusively linking the code "DD" to him. Corroboration from a contact saved as "DD Personal", Truecaller data and other digital material was held too tenuous to supply the missing nexus. Presumptions under sections 132(4A) and 292C were confined to the person from whom the documents were found and could not be transposed to the assessee without independent evidence. The notice, consequential assessment and addition were therefore unsustainable, and the Revenue's appeal was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
