Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Joint development agreements defer taxable transfer where possession lacks part performance, while completed flats determine consideration and exempti...
Passenger baggage re-export requires true declaration and cannot be granted indirectly through discretionary redemption of undeclared prohibited goods...
An assessment order issued under the GST regime without a Document Identification Number was treated as non-est and unsustainable, following the principle that a DIN is mandatory for validity. The Court also held that a writ petition challenging the original assessment remained maintainable even though the statutory appeal had been dismissed as time-barred, since the challenge was directed to the invalidity of the foundational order. The assessment order was set aside and the matter remanded to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration in accordance with law, with exclusion of the intervening period for limitation purposes.
An assessment order issued under the GST regime without a Document Identification Number was treated as non-est and unsustainable, following the principle that a DIN is mandatory for validity. The Court also held that a writ petition challenging the original assessment remained maintainable even though the statutory appeal had been dismissed as time-barred, since the challenge was directed to the invalidity of the foundational order. The assessment order was set aside and the matter remanded to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration in accordance with law, with exclusion of the intervening period for limitation purposes.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.