Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
An assessment order issued under the GST regime without a Document Identification Number was treated as non-est and unsustainable, following the principle that a DIN is mandatory for validity. The Court also held that a writ petition challenging the original assessment remained maintainable even though the statutory appeal had been dismissed as time-barred, since the challenge was directed to the invalidity of the foundational order. The assessment order was set aside and the matter remanded to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration in accordance with law, with exclusion of the intervening period for limitation purposes.
An assessment order issued under the GST regime without a Document Identification Number was treated as non-est and unsustainable, following the principle that a DIN is mandatory for validity. The Court also held that a writ petition challenging the original assessment remained maintainable even though the statutory appeal had been dismissed as time-barred, since the challenge was directed to the invalidity of the foundational order. The assessment order was set aside and the matter remanded to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration in accordance with law, with exclusion of the intervening period for limitation purposes.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.